Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140530
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 13 '17 at 17:48
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3258-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 62
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 96.9
42% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 135
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 04D3) 2GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.9.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 8.67
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 23.7
7% 16.3 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 25.2
18% 20.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 148
Write 154
Mixed 137
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.23
83% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 109%
Intenso Rainbow Line 16GB
8GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 4.34
Mixed 4.03
7% 6.38 MB/s
4K Read 2.31
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.003
9% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 5.2
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 3,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback