Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory115.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 15 '20 at 18:02
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 86.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 982
88% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,691
105% 1,691 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4990) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.5% Very good
Lighting 96.7
Reflection 102
Parallax 101
79% 99.8 fps
MRender 85.6
Gravity 88.1
Splatting 72.5
66% 82.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 445 64 343 432 217 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 2,332
Write 439
Mixed 597
SusWrite 335
200% 926 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 46
156% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 672
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 456
341% 465 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 183%
Great: 321%
Avago MR9460-16i 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 5.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 253 253 245 255 242 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Intel Raid 10 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2011 2087 2095 2107 2111 1982 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 1,755
Write 2,159
Mixed 1,564
SusWrite 2,065
427% 1,886 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 71.1
238% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 668
597% 913 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 316%
Great: 316%
Intel 540s Series 1TB
154GB free
Firmware: LSF036C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 403 120 113 115 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 434
Mixed 375
SusWrite 209
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 42.6
147% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 220
189% 276 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 96%
Intel 540s Series 1TB
419GB free
Firmware: LSF036C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
2.23% Terrible
Read 13
Write 19.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 20.6
4% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.2
2% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 96%
Avago MR9460-16i 32TB
14TB free
Firmware: 5.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 21 22 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Avago MR9460-16i 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: 5.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 7.5 7.3 7.8 7.6 7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.2% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 7.1
10% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
182% 1.23 MB/s
Avago MR9460-16i 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 298 299 300 302 302 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 69.2
MC Mixed 38.2
137% 48.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 11.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 119%
Great: 184%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback