Asus Z87-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z87-PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140818
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '20 at 02:02
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 102 2-Core 191 76% 129 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 457 49% 391 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2974) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	53% Above average	Lighting 66.3 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 62 54% 66 fps	MRender 72.9 Gravity 62.2 Splatting 55.1 51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 68 66 65 63 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Read 455 Write 438 Mixed 377 SusWrite 102 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 54.7 187% 66 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 349 263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 124%
Samsung MZ7LH1T9HMLT-00005 2TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 517GB free Firmware: 304Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 428 424 444 444 451 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 469 Write 456 Mixed 414 SusWrite 433 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 45.1 157% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 357 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 120%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 118GB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 73 63 75 74 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 25 Write 49.2 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 73.5 37% 49.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 96%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 2TB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8 7.7 8.1 8 8.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 38.8 Write 40.7 Mixed 33 SusWrite 8 22% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 92%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 2TB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8 7.7 8.1 8 8.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 37 Write 25.3 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 8 18% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 87%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 4TB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8 7.7 8.1 8.1 9.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 39.8 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 8.3 23% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 87%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 6TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 4TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8 7.7 8.1 8 8.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 37 Write 25.5 Mixed 27 SusWrite 8 18% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.9 273% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 58%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B0 6TB 666GB free Firmware: ER03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 127 125 125 126 125 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 129 Write 172 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 127 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.1 275% 2.2 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 2,161 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.7% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 10.6 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 10.9 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z87-PRO Builds (Compare 2,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PRO - $135

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	1,092x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	422x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	236x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	170x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	159x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	159x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	101x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	97x

RAM
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	59x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	53x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16