Lenovo 81F8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81F8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 14:05
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 68.9
39% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 77.2
8-Core 77.9
10% 77.6 Pts
64-Core 77.9
5% 77.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 380F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.40.16
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5
Parallax 6.12
3% 4.94 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 4.17
Splatting 4
3% 3.66 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 241 248 248 278 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 370
Write 312
Mixed 302
SusWrite 252
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 23.8
81% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 142
109% 149 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 12GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81F8 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback