Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QR_X510QR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QR_X510QR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510QR
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '20 at 13:31
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 64
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 95
44% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 148
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 113F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 6
3% 4.73 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 4.52
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 356 362 383 121 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 322
Write 277
Mixed 324
SusWrite 260
67% 296 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 29.3
96% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 165
125% 168 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 132 134 133 134 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 135
Write 113
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 128
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
200% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 CB8GS2400.C8ET 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.4
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QR_X510QR Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QR_X510QR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback