Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	50% Average	Memory 57.2 1-Core 45.6 2-Core 94.4 40% 65.7 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 639 48% 434 Pts	64-Core 879 54% 879 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 91 87 85 83 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 376 Write 274 Mixed 212 SusWrite 109 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 7.5 37% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 59.7 DQ Mixed 6.6 16% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 403GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 142 142 142 142 142 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 159 Write 150 Mixed 101 SusWrite 141 102% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB 7,702 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	83% Excellent	MC Read 36.4 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 30.5 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 18.9 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	114x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	111x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	97x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	139x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	119x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $474

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16