Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 45.3 2-Core 95.6 40% 65.6 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 651 44% 416 Pts	64-Core 883 55% 883 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 98 87 111 101 98 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.4% Poor	Read 77.3 Write 268 Mixed 209 SusWrite 119 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 10 37% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 38.3 DQ Mixed 17.8 19% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 403GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 142 142 141 142 142 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 158 Write 151 Mixed 98 SusWrite 141 101% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB 7,702 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 30.4 94% 32.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 18.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	114x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	111x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	97x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	138x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	119x

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $478

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16