HP ZBook 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook 17  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 190A
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime10 Days
Run DateMar 11 '20 at 03:07
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 143
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 325
37% 289 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3100M
HP(103C 197A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.09
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Lighting 7.97
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 8.81
6% 7.94 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 7
Splatting 10
8% 9.01 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 178 172 157 239 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 315
Write 166
Mixed 178
SusWrite 180
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 23.4
80% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 102
84% 121 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
917GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 106
Write 76.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 106
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 16.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 17 Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback