TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock H61M/U3S3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '20 at 13:15
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 154
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 293
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 68.1%
 Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 46 88 51 50 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.1% Below average
Read 214
Write 29.2
Mixed 118
SusWrite 56.7
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 11.8
60% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 39.2
DQ Mixed 12.4
14% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 31.1%
 Great: 70%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 77 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 83.5
Write 79
Mixed 52
SusWrite 74.5
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 45.5%
 Great: 65%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
0GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.9 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 1
Mixed 2
SusWrite 4.4
6% 6.55 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.72%
 Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 40.9%
 Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H61M/U3S3 Builds (Compare 297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M/U3S3

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel  $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples42x
Core i7-2600Intel  $126Bench 67%, 185,630 samples27x
Core i3-2100Intel  $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples26x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples46x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples20x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples17x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples12x
BX500 480GBCrucial  $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples7x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples10x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 50%, 208 samples8x
FLFF65F-C8KL9 2x4GBKingmaxBench 46%, 860 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback