Intel VORKE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemIntel VORKE V2
MotherboardIntel VORKE V2  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '20 at 09:29
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 467
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1991 5593) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Lighting 6.73
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 7.41
6% 7.74 fps
MRender 7.29
Gravity 5.83
Splatting 13.9
8% 9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MG BGM.2 NGFF SSD 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 200 199 203 200 204 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 378
Write 177
Mixed 166
SusWrite 200
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 6.9
66% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 61.7
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 48.4
60% 103 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 77%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
529GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 86 87 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 52.3
Write 79.7
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 85.8
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
33GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 18.4
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 20.7
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.5
122% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MG8ATAF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback