Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 08 '20 at 20:49
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 594
62% 499 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.7% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 47.8
49% 53.9 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 49.8
40% 48.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 960GB
777GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STKSC010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 411 433 420 422 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 236
Write 104
Mixed 167
SusWrite 363
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 40.1
149% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 215
184% 268 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 104%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
284GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 97 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 186
Write 188
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 95.9
88% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.86% Terrible
Read 36
Write 34
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 2.2
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.86%
Great: 49%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
194GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 23.8
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 17.2
33% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 38%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68AX9N0 2TB
379GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 35.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 2.2
30% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 50%
TOSHIBA HDWD120 2TB
84GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 37.6
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 17.2
42% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 30
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,936 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $368
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback