Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive335% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 07 '20 at 05:38
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,171
105% 885 Pts
64-Core 1,462
90% 1,462 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 215
Parallax 204
162% 206 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 198
Splatting 133
153% 195 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 147%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$152
742GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1686 2049 1478 1186 1187 1183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
335% Outstanding
Read 2,485
Write 2,425
Mixed 1750
SusWrite 1,462
456% 2,030 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 88
296% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,302
DQ Write 1141
DQ Mixed 1,221
915% 1,221 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 335%
Great: 372%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 236 236 235 236 235 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 232
Write 237
Mixed 107
SusWrite 235
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 1.7
10% 4.33 MB/s
DQ Read 3.7
DQ Write 7.1
DQ Mixed 2.3
3% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 130%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
223GB free
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 137 158 162 175 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 309
Write 246
Mixed 284
SusWrite 160
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 47.3
170% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 183
153% 220 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 84%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
223GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 136 121 134 151 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 328
Write 214
Mixed 243
SusWrite 138
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 39.7
152% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 169
127% 166 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 153 164 166 168 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 151
Mixed 109
SusWrite 161
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 32.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 32.5
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $791
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback