Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory61.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '20 at 15:27
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 172
57% 104 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 632
57% 482 Pts
64-Core 1,615
100% 1,615 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 152
Parallax 131
115% 141 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 136
Splatting 111
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 475GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 410 409 446 461 457 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 442
Mixed 380
SusWrite 434
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 39.2
132% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 219
169% 228 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98%
Great: 167%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
642GB free
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1683 1622 1450 1151 1163 1159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,415
Write 1,498
Mixed 1,332
SusWrite 1,371
317% 1,404 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 57.4
194% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 721
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 652
472% 616 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 227%
Great: 372%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 1H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 128 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 130
Write 123
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 128
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74%
Great: 72%
WDC WD60 EFAX-68SHWN0 6TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.3% Poor
Read 35.8
Write 34.4
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 19.1
39% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.4
236% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 84%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 30.7
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 19.1
37% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix-00AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9... 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 29.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.8
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback