Asus P8H61-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	65.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LE (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '20 at 13:04
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 190 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 365 47% 355 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Gigabyte(1458 3685) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	65.2% Good	Lighting 83.7 Reflection 83 Parallax 79.2 68% 82 fps	MRender 78.6 Gravity 74.7 Splatting 66.9 59% 73.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S064G 63GB 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.1.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 239 Write 180 Mixed 86.9 37% 169 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 11.6 43% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 11 DQ Mixed 13 12% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 47%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 360GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 148 159 158 159 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 156 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 152 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 109%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 442GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 22 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 32 Write 24 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 21.7 33% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 43%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 0GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 11 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	4.48% Terrible	Read 10 Write 1.7 Mixed 7 SusWrite 11.1 10% 7.45 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.48% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G4D1 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.6% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.8 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 16.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	163x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	110x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	83x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	158x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	28x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	20x
859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GBUnknownBench 53%, 62 samples	18x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16