To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080522
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '20 at 11:03
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 3.40GHz 3,806 User benchmarks, average bench 32% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 61.3 1-Core 23 2-Core 54 32% 46.1 Pts	4-Core 55.1 8-Core 55.2 7% 55.2 Pts	64-Core 49.4 3% 49.4 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 0473) 2GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.58 Parallax 1.56 1% 1.48 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.28 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150 998 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 40 49 33 24 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 52 Write 45.9 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 38.2 30% 41.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 33%
Maxtor 6L160M0 164GB 1,484 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 127GB free Firmware: BANC1G10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 1.6 0.2 0.3 0.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Write 0.3 Mixed 0.3 SusWrite 0.5 0% 0.37 MB/s	4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 37%
TOSHIBA MK1646GSX 160GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 11GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 23.1 Write 19.4 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 19 26% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	719x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	281x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	267x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	618x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	305x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16