Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 03 '20 at 06:53
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 239
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 428
59% 436 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8468) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 52.8
Reflection 48.2
Parallax 62.5
43% 54.5 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 46.3
46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 170 186 118 86 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55% Above average
Read 403
Write 388
Mixed 321
SusWrite 139
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 26.9
87% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 38.8
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 51.4
44% 62 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 55%
Great: 118%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
828GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 96 93 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 98.5
Write 94.8
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 92.1
106% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback