TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory44.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '20 at 16:11
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3235
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 76.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 259
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 1,022
91% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,986
123% 1,986 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 86.1%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Apple(106B 0203) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 32GB, Driver: 19.20.01.04
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 94
Parallax 206
106% 143 fps
MRender 99.6
Gravity 146
Splatting 136
106% 127 fps
Poor: 98% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7174
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1938 1953 1510 1496 1562 1384 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 6x8GB
6 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
129% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 65.6
MC Mixed 46.5
152% 53.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 9.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 129% ↑
This bench: 129%
 Great: 149%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

CPU
Xeon W-3245IntelBench 84%, 92 samples8x
Xeon W-3223IntelBench 79%, 91 samples7x
Xeon W-3235IntelBench 84%, 50 samples4x
GPU
Radeon Pro 580XAMDBench 47%, 31 samples5x
Radeon Pro W5700XAMDBench 100%, 18 samples3x
RX Vega-64AMD  $400Bench 87%, 91,676 samples3x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples4x
SM1024G PCIe 1TBAppleBench 169%, 404 samples2x
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TBBench 360%, 6,289 samples2x
RAM
9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 ... 96GBMicronBench 155%, 5 samples4x
HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 4x8GBHynixBench 84%, 118 samples3x
HMA82GR7CJR4N-WM 6x16GBHynixBench 123%, 25 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback