Gatewa GT5224

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGatewa GT5224  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel D945GCZ
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060501
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '20 at 15:28
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.60GHz
J3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 30.1
2-Core 59.8
36% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 59.1
8-Core 59.8
8% 59.4 Pts
64-Core 60
4% 60 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20151204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 253
Write 55.5
Mixed 104
SusWrite 69.7
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 8.7
59% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 69.4
DQ Write 69.3
DQ Mixed 43.2
40% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40
422GB free
Firmware: K2AOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 54.9
Write 60.1
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 57.8
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback