Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (100th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 0 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming X (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '20 at 10:11
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 85.4 1-Core 127 2-Core 254 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 748 78% 627 Pts	64-Core 755 47% 755 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 863F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Lighting 80.1 Reflection 79.7 Parallax 69.1 65% 76.3 fps	MRender 75.3 Gravity 74.2 Splatting 76.5 62% 75.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 5,247 Write 34.6 Mixed 67.7 370% 1,783 MB/s	4K Read 456 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 4.7 698% 154 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 38GB free Firmware: Z3311000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 5,052 Write 32.5 Mixed 67.5 356% 1,717 MB/s	4K Read 449 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 4.6 688% 152 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 70%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 604GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 5,381 Write 5.3 Mixed 10.3 1,285% 1,799 MB/s	4K Read 365 4K Mixed 0.7 22,904% 183 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
External USB3.0 500GB 1,761 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 21GB free Firmware: 0204 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 5,260 Write 41.5 Mixed 72.2 1,282% 1,791 MB/s	4K Read 451 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 3.7 19,219% 152 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB 11,950 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 42 MC Write 39.1 MC Mixed 36.4 112% 39.2 GB/s	SC Read 27 SC Write 40.3 SC Mixed 33.1 96% 33.5 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	26x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	17x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	7x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $403

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16