Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '20 at 00:29
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 61.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
72% 135 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 907
80% 681 Pts
64-Core 2,410
149% 2,410 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 81.1
56% 70 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 78.4
56% 67.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
899GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2338 2164 1175 1181 1177 1176 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,550
Write 2,354
Mixed 1,609
SusWrite 1,535
451% 2,012 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 79.9
264% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 378
288% 387 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 296%
Great: 372%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1911 1922 1928 1917 1076 838 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,496
Write 1,859
Mixed 960
SusWrite 1,599
385% 1,728 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 64.1
216% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 506
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 421
314% 421 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 284%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
82GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 294 293 294 293 295 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 472
Mixed 407
SusWrite 313
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 45.6
149% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 161
123% 165 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
393GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 467 468 469 467 469 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 474
Mixed 405
SusWrite 468
104% 459 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 45.6
150% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 172
129% 172 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 98 102 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 63
SusWrite 99.7
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
133% Outstanding
MC Read 51.9
MC Write 56.8
MC Mixed 50.4
152% 53 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 21.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 133%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $834
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback