Asrock H61M-VG3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG3  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '17 at 01:10
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 94
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 185
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 220
34% 245 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.2% Very good
Lighting 86.7
Reflection 95.5
Parallax 77.8
71% 86.7 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 95.9
Splatting 88.2
75% 92.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
13GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.5% Good
Read 268
Write 213
Mixed 219
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 31.4
107% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 77.8
84% 140 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P22OAB6A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 66.4
Write 56
Mixed 58.9
46% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.34
81% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1600 C7 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 21
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VG3 Builds (Compare 1,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG3 - $55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback