TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '20 at 21:13
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 250
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 946
85% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,331
82% 1,331 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 83.6%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 4509)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 139
Parallax 154
120% 147 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 128
Splatting 104
108% 137 fps
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 113%
 Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 370 437 447 453 453 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 439
Mixed 410
SusWrite 420
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 45.8
149% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 290
240% 345 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 125%
hp v112b 16GB
11GB free, PID db07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 13 12 13 8.8 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 15.7
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 11.1
16% 14 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 10.3%
 Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.4% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 24.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 24.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 75.4%
 Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME B450-PLUS Builds (Compare 5,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples1,082x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples934x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples395x
GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples340x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples302x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples247x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples151x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples120x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples112x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples374x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples340x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples266x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback