Mikrolog PRO-Q77 IU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMikrolog PRO-Q77 IU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8Q77-M
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '20 at 10:19
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 176
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 335
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 3625) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 33.4
20% 27.1 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 24.3
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 78 82 80 77 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 415
Write 103
Mixed 124
SusWrite 69.8
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 17.4
67% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 23.4
DQ Mixed 41.5
38% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 53%
Ts64gssd TS6440 64GB
33GB free
Firmware: SVN423c
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 78 79 78 79 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.3% Above average
Read 360
Write 74.6
Mixed 113
SusWrite 76.2
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 28.1
101% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 52.1
55% 91.8 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO-Q77 IU Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Mikrolog PRO-Q77 IU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback