Asus P8H61-M LX3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120111
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '20 at 18:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 143
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 210
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5530
PwrHis(1787 3001) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 1.03
1% 1.01 fps
MRender 1.14
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.01 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 32 46 98 133 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31% Below average
Read 211
Write 185
Mixed 166
SusWrite 87
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 15.8
52% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 25.6
DQ Mixed 20.6
16% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31%
Great: 55%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41
241GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 93 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 26.7
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 93.6
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback