Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '20 at 14:33
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 72 1-Core 132 2-Core 264 84% 156 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 818 77% 641 Pts	64-Core 1,338 83% 1,338 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 2310) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.6% Below average	Lighting 45.3 Reflection 63.2 Parallax 64.7 37% 57.8 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 49.5 Splatting 53 45% 55.3 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,930 Write 1,474 Mixed 604 294% 1,336 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 51.1 207% 79.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,056 DQ Write 965 DQ Mixed 773 645% 931 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 203GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 424 432 443 429 442 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 512 Write 445 Mixed 421 SusWrite 432 102% 453 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 28.2 116% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 45.9 68% 132 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 92%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 177GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 421 429 436 426 440 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 435 Mixed 422 SusWrite 428 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 28.1 121% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 85.2 DQ Mixed 49.7 66% 122 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 92%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 102GB free Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 384 275 256 296 277 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 426 Write 384 Mixed 264 SusWrite 313 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 29.3 100% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 59.6 DQ Mixed 79.6 65% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 113%
Seagate Portable 250GB 728 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 106GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 35 36 34 36 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 32.5 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 34.7 43% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 35,395 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	64.5% Good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 25.4 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 24.5 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 96.8 41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	419x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)