TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemSamsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520
Memory4.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '20 at 20:00
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 144
58% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 188
32% 225 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 63.4%
 Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Sanyo(144D C597) 512MB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 376.54
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.42 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 2.48
2% 2.62 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 2.03%
 Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 171 148 146 147 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.1% Good
Read 241
Write 222
Mixed 213
SusWrite 168
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 32.5
103% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 61.1%
 Great: 115%
Jmicron Corp. 640GB
313GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.2% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 20.5
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 28.8
19% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 17.2%
 Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG 9905417-017.A01G 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.2% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520

CPU
Core i3-2310MIntel  $80Bench 46%, 25,542 samples80x
Core i5-2410MIntel  $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples69x
Core i3-2330MIntel  $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples21x
GPU
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples111x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples77x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples9x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples8x
MX500 500GBCrucial  $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples7x
MX500 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples6x
RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples25x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples10x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 2,424 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback