HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime11 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 142
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 218
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 22.3
20% 22 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 19.1
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata S510 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.3.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 88 84 92 88 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.6% Below average
Read 135
Write 115
Mixed 122
SusWrite 87.8
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 23.3
85% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 90.6
DQ Mixed 32.8
33% 49.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3FD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 121 122 116 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 130
Mixed 56
SusWrite 119
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 68%
USB Flash Memory 2GB
2GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.5 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 3.2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 3.3
5% 3.92 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL51264BA160A.16FH BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $303
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback