Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 147 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 256 34% 256 Pts	64-Core 281 17% 281 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 375B) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.23% Terrible	Lighting 4.97 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 4.94 4% 4.81 fps	MRender 6.52 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.23% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 80 89 84 96 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.3% Below average	Read 142 Write 85.5 Mixed 112 SusWrite 84.3 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 17.9 72% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 97.1 DQ Mixed 99.3 86% 131 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 110%
iXpand Flash Drive 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 59GB free, PID cff0 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	6.91% Terrible	Read 10.7 Write 11.5 Mixed 10 SusWrite 12 15% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.9 62% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.91% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB 188 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.3% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 5.5 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM