ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP p6695a

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP p6695a (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '20 at 05:37
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 164 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 293 39% 294 Pts	64-Core 291 18% 291 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 375B) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.23% Terrible	Lighting 4.97 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 4.97 4% 4.82 fps	MRender 6.48 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.22 5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.23% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 138 105 103 102 112 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.2% Above average	Read 236 Write 224 Mixed 179 SusWrite 126 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 50.2 4K Mixed 25.2 87% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 173 132% 180 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 110%
iXpand Flash Drive 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 59GB free, PID cff0 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	8.3% Terrible	Read 11.2 Write 12.2 Mixed 11.8 SusWrite 12.2 16% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.3 90% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 8.3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB 188 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.2% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 7.7 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback