Asus K55VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K55VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55VM
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '20 at 17:15
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 130
62% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 181
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M
Asus(1043 1447) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.69
Parallax 4.03
4% 4.91 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 4.87
Splatting 3.52
4% 4.95 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 94 62 46 46 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 340
Write 261
Mixed 119
SusWrite 67.8
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 5.9
32% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 26.5
DQ Mixed 63.6
52% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 82%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
638GB free
Firmware: JE4OA60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 90 89 91 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 85.3
Write 95.4
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 87.8
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.M8F Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K55VM Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K55VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback