Supermicro X10DAx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X10DAx  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAX
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '20 at 05:08
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 204
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 662
59% 501 Pts
64-Core 1,623
100% 1,623 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Asus(1043 8689) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
136% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 218
Parallax 227
144% 207 fps
MRender 229
Gravity 192
Splatting 132
145% 184 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 136%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
198GB free
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 367 230 310 578 342 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,133
Write 894
Mixed 116
SusWrite 443
143% 646 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 28.3
114% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 50.5
DQ Mixed 115
133% 244 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 121%
Great: 311%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,344
Write 2,096
Mixed 1,381
431% 1,940 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 64.3
204% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 665
DQ Mixed 714
541% 730 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
10GB free
Firmware: 400i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 372
Write 268
Mixed 282
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 32.1
112% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 226
179% 250 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB
149GB free
Firmware: A5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 106 105 121 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 107
Write 78.8
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 105
57% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HDN726060AL 6TB
32GB free
Firmware: W7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 88 93 102 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 105
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 93.3
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 119%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 96 103 106 119 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 127
Write 112
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 104
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 99%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
3GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 17 18 21 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 20
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 17.8
30% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.5
152% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GB
4 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 15.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10DAx Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Supermicro X10DAx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback