Lenovo 20138

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20138  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130314
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 19:36
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 109
52% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 281
29% 233 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3901) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.43
4% 5.06 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 512GB-$283
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 222 221 217 224 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.4% Above average
Read 236
Write 234
Mixed 212
SusWrite 221
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 25.7
86% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 163
131% 184 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 111%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
901GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 97 98 96 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 99.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 97.9
61% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0832 2TB
917GB free, PID 0832
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 29
Write 22.7
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 27.2
32% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DCST8GN128S Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CH9 16GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20138 Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $136
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback