TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 22:48
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 243
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 463
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 87.5%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
XFX(1682 C580)
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.3
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 70.8
Parallax 78.6
52% 71.2 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 65
Splatting 56
51% 63.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 52%
 Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 112 107 116 130 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 117
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 67.5%
 Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 KHX1600C9D3/4GX Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 65%
 Great: 65%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel  $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples198x
Core i5-4570Intel  $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples130x
Core i5-4440Intel  $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples78x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples45x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples41x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples25x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples24x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples16x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback