PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 11.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H (all builds) |
Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20091118 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 21 '20 at 20:18 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X3 455-$90
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
40.1%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
|
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 70 118 102 132 135 MB/s
|
11.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
103GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 43 43 43 43 MB/s
|
43.3%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159
71GB free
Firmware: V56OA7EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 43 43 43 43 MB/s
|
20.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
18%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+AMDBench 41%, 5,594 samples | 2x |
Athlon II X3 455AMD $90Bench 45%, 3,733 samples | 1x |
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+AMDBench 37%, 5,400 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples | 1x |
Radeon HD 6450AMDBench 2%, 32,407 samples | 1x |
GTX 650 Ti BoostNvidia $140Bench 17%, 15,701 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 6% - Terrible | Total price: $196 |