Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$112 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 157 61% 104 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 320 40% 303 Pts	64-Core 251 16% 251 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Lighting 45.9 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 39.7 37% 39.1 fps	MRender 39.5 Gravity 42.5 Splatting 37.7 32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240LE 240GB 1,978 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: JD2019 SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 9.7 46 29 29 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 493 Write 432 Mixed 19 SusWrite 78.3 56% 255 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 0.7 39% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 91.9 DQ Write 10.7 DQ Mixed 0.7 13% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2133C14/8G KHX3200C16D4/8GX 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	80% Very good	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 26.8 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 22.8 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	126x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	97x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	85x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $305

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16