Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 10:48
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 247
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 738
75% 608 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 170
Parallax 188
140% 177 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 155
Splatting 119
122% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 296 346 336 330 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 444
Mixed 306
SusWrite 322
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 38.3
125% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 166
173% 285 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 118%
LSI MR9261-8i 20TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 667 680 470 555 597 663 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
172GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1851 1488 1483 1496 1489 1489 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,980
Write 1999
Mixed 1,760
SusWrite 1,549
410% 1,822 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.2
188% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 472
344% 449 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 252%
Great: 347%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
521GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 977 976 981 992 991 995 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Msft Virtual HD 966GB
12GB free
Firmware: 10.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 170
Write 254
Mixed 210
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 11.4
38% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 84.2
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 87.5
66% 86.8 MB/s
Zalman External HDD 1TB
611GB free
Firmware: MCCI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 99 100 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 39
SusWrite 100
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB-$165
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2693 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 39.5
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 26.3
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback