Asus TS700-E7-RS8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus TS700-E7-RS8  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D16 Series
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 00:48
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 41.8
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 94.5
35% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 376
32% 277 Pts
64-Core 1,196
74% 1,196 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 58%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 117 121 124 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 426
Write 141
Mixed 192
SusWrite 121
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 29.3
104% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 162
122% 165 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 31.3
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.2
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback