Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	68% Good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 187 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 438 43% 354 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 309 311 311 311 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 472 Write 324 Mixed 299 SusWrite 309 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 23.6 90% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 59.1 DQ Mixed 89.6 77% 118 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 128%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$90 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 66GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 111 109 112 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 95.4 Write 99.6 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 112 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF M378B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	56.1% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 18.1 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,200x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	991x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	941x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	228x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	159x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	152x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16