Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '20 at 18:36
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 365
46% 352 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Asus(1043 84D8) 2GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Lighting 9.47
Reflection 9
Parallax 11.2
8% 9.91 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.7
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 58 64 52 57 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 403
Write 114
Mixed 114
SusWrite 60.1
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 9.6
75% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 98.6
DQ Write 50.8
DQ Mixed 8.7
24% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
6GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 80 83 83 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 70.8
Write 73.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 80.4
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBNT Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-HD3 Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3 - $152

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback