HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1790
Memory	3.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120503
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '20 at 13:14
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$248 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 94.6 2-Core 186 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 359 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 3555) 2GB CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.2 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 0.07 0% 0.07 fps
Poor: 8% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 281GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 662 281 281 292 296 299 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 71GB free Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 234 233 233 234 232 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.2% Good	Read 248 Write 205 Mixed 199 SusWrite 233 50% 221 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 28.1 95% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 192 144% 191 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.7 Write 39 Mixed 24.7 21% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 KHX1600C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 12GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.3% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 15.7 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 10.6 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	620x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $248Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	159x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	108x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	72x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	33x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	25x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16