Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 23:46
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 126
54% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 731
67% 560 Pts
64-Core 1,352
84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 93.6
Parallax 242
64% 138 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 132
Splatting 152
110% 132 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 639 426 429 425 429 423 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 2,012
Write 1,969
Mixed 1,291
SusWrite 462
320% 1,433 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 55.4
176% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 728
DQ Write 527
DQ Mixed 331
328% 529 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 192%
Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
188GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 800 858 848 854 852 856 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,301
Write 1,104
Mixed 1,102
SusWrite 845
244% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 56.4
179% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 620
476% 634 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 188%
Great: 346%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
135GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 277 274 275 275 275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 468
Write 293
Mixed 343
SusWrite 289
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 40.6
134% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 37
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 208
157% 200 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87%
Great: 118%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 54 52 54 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 190
Write 175
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 53.3
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 104%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 645GB
330GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 53 52 56 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.6% Very good
Read 192
Write 142
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 53.7
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71.6% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 23.9
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 22.5
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback