Asrock 990FX Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics65.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 02:22
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 120
54% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 242
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Asus(1043 86E8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.3% Good
Lighting 81.9
Reflection 83.7
Parallax 72.1
67% 79.3 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 80
Splatting 78.2
63% 76 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
700GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 276 350 366 365 366 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 383
Write 355
Mixed 300
SusWrite 319
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 31.5
108% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 87.4
DQ Mixed 43.9
38% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71%
Great: 121%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
215GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 271 278 102 94 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 393
Write 341
Mixed 310
SusWrite 173
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 20.3
92% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 23.2
28% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBSR F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBSR F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme3 Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme3 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback