Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '20 at 09:57
Run Duration360 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 70.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 1,019
95% 791 Pts
64-Core 1438
89% 1438 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
135% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 177
Parallax 174
153% 180 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 160
Splatting 112
124% 158 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 135%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2077 749 616 612 613 615 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,418
Write 2,292
Mixed 1,668
SusWrite 880
406% 1,815 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 84.1
280% 97.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,191
DQ Write 1,052
DQ Mixed 1,124
842% 1,122 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 287%
Great: 340%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$96
473GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 177 181 177 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 167
Mixed 30
SusWrite 178
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA MK5075GSX 500GB
374GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 67 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 80
Write 80.2
Mixed 39
SusWrite 66.7
88% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 24.7
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 24.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback