Empty empty

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Empty empty (all builds)
Motherboard	TYAN S7012
Memory	69.4 GB free of 80 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110923
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '20 at 13:18
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 93.4 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 186 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 559 57% 460 Pts	64-Core 1,323 82% 1,323 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3418) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.4% Above average	Lighting 64.7 Reflection 66.8 Parallax 84.4 53% 72 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 70.5 Splatting 56.2 52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 442GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 190 190 189 190 190 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.1% Average	Read 188 Write 188 Mixed 131 SusWrite 189 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 32.4 4K Mixed 19.3 61% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 61.8 DQ Mixed 26.6 25% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 133%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 230GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 145 152 127 190 186 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.2% Below average	Read 203 Write 193 Mixed 156 SusWrite 166 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 15.8 58% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.3 DQ Write 71 DQ Mixed 21.6 24% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 99%
Lacie 2Big Quadra v3 10TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2TB free Firmware: 051E SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 25.8 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 13.1 17% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 70%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 1,520 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2TB free, PID 6124 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 23.3 Write 23.5 Mixed 22 SusWrite 11.8 27% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 79%
Samsung S2 Portable 1TB 1,558 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 930GB free, PID 1f0a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 25.8 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 11.9 30% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 20%
WD My Passport 2TB 10,723 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2TB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 1 1 0.9 1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Read 0.8 Write 0.8 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.9 1% 0.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 15% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B... 80GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 18.2 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 9.8 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical empty Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	38x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	26x
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	22x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	52x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	42x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	29x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359