Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 76.4 2-Core 153 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 431 43% 350 Pts	64-Core 467 29% 467 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 159 226 223 220 177 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 368 Write 261 Mixed 284 SusWrite 200 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 17.5 57% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 143 127% 192 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 91%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 154 153 154 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 156 Write 149 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 154 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8 CT51264BA160BJ.C8 CT51264BA160BJ.C8 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.9% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11.5 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $609

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16