Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '20 at 01:39
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 117
2-Core 235
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 896
80% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,272
79% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2890 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 191
Parallax 174
148% 182 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 179
Splatting 123
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1055 1001 1136 1128 887 723 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,410
Write 2,268
Mixed 1,409
SusWrite 988
395% 1,769 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 58
187% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 860
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 804
580% 755 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 248%
Great: 372%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
578GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 67 66 68 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 68.5
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 65.8
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 69 69 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 58.7
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 69.1
47% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 33.5
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 27.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback