Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	55.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '20 at 21:44
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Memory 90 1-Core 150 2-Core 294 97% 178 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 928 90% 738 Pts	64-Core 1,585 98% 1,585 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8662) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 169 Reflection 161 Parallax 172 138% 167 fps	Gravity 147 Splatting 111 112% 129 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$372 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 3TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 411 404 414 390 365 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 447 Write 423 Mixed 311 SusWrite 396 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 31.5 107% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 223 173% 244 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 133%
Toshiba HDWN160 6TB 489 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 5.5TB free Firmware: FS1M SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 206 199 205 205 197 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3333 C16 4x16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.1% Very good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 22.3 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 21.2 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 67.3 60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	862x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	133x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $294Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	108x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	295x
RTX 3090Nvidia $835Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	110x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	98x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	128x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $151Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	98x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	66x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	70x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	56x
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,055

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $36	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16