HP EliteBook 8470w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8470w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160929
Uptime14 Days
Run DateJan 03 '17 at 17:04
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 172
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 425
48% 375 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro M2000
HP(103C 1789) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.200.0.0
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Lighting 5.27
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 4.22
4% 4.78 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.26
4% 4.55 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-512L9M-11 MSATA 512GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HM9110F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 463
Write 398
Mixed 417
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 20.8
68% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 51
57% 99.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 97%
Liteonit LMT-32L3M 32GB
14GB free
Firmware: LWDA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.9% Average
Read 262
Write 88.1
Mixed 133
35% 161 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 17.2
64% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 82.6
DQ Mixed 40.5
52% 95.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 60%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
212GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0E0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 84.6
Write 75.3
Mixed 76.2
59% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.22
70% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.3% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470w Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback