Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '20 at 02:58
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 875
80% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,314
81% 1,314 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 229
Parallax 226
173% 222 fps
MRender 254
Gravity 225
Splatting 145
164% 208 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 156%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 673 675 675 675 674 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,406
Write 2,257
Mixed 1340
SusWrite 782
379% 1,696 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 55.6
196% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 993
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 918
676% 892 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 244%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
215GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 477 475 474 474 474 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 481
Mixed 411
SusWrite 475
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 58.2
194% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 360
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 481 480 477 478 479 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 477
Mixed 387
SusWrite 479
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 47
164% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 276
228% 327 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 116%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 32.8
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 33
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 108%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback