Supermicro X10DAx

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	144GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 144GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro X10DAx (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X10DAX
Memory	133.6 GB free of 144 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180223
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '20 at 23:30
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 15 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 104 2-Core 204 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 641 58% 487 Pts	64-Core 1,587 98% 1,587 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8689) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 20.6 Reflection 23.8 Parallax 19.4 17% 21.3 fps	MRender 29.5 Gravity 20.7 Splatting 27 21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB 77,062 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 213GB free Firmware: S5Z42102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 619 469 382 226 470 256 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 1,625 Write 1,019 Mixed 128 SusWrite 404 174% 794 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 17.2 76% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 28.7 DQ Mixed 48.2 60% 114 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 311%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,398 Write 810 Mixed 1,098 313% 1,436 MB/s	4K Read 52.4 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 32.1 136% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 829 DQ Write 44.4 DQ Mixed 101 158% 325 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 10GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 221 138 113 104 158 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 385 Write 159 Mixed 240 SusWrite 144 51% 232 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 15.1 4K Mixed 20.2 78% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 33 DQ Mixed 58.4 69% 127 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 157GB free Firmware: A5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 113 109 113 94 136 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 164 Write 120 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 111 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDN726060AL 6TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 32GB free Firmware: W7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 81 87 79 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 106 Write 110 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 90.4 66% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.1 188% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 119%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 98 96 88 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 129 Write 87.5 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 99.5 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 99%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 3GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 15 16 12 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 20.5 Mixed 19 SusWrite 15.9 28% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.8 190% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A8K40B21-CTC Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF M393A8K40B21-CTC Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 79GB 2400, 2133, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2133 MHz 32767, 4096, 4096, 32767, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.6% Below average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 10.9 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 15 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X10DAx Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 121%

UFO

System: Supermicro X10DAx

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2683 v41stBench 64%, 294 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v31stBench 63%, 481 samples	3x

GPU
RTX 2080Nvidia $270Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	7x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	6x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	4x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	6x
530 Series 240GBIntel $149Bench 76%, 16,872 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF ... 128GBHynixBench 57%, 4 samples	4x
HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 14x31.9GBHynixBench 105%, 4 samples	3x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16